Why Were Ranveer & Deepika’s On-Screen Characters So Aloof?

Namaste, Bollywood lovers! It’s your favorite snoop, Khabree Kiran, back with some masaledar khabar straight from the filmi duniya! Today, we’re diving into the curious case of Ranveer Singh and Deepika Padukone’s missing jadoo in Rohit Shetty’s latest dhamaka, "Singham Again." Sit tight, kyunki picture abhi baaki hai mere dost! 🎬😎

Rohit Shetty’s Ramayana Twist: Sorry, No Pyaar for DeepVeer!

Arrey bhai, if you were waiting to see Ranveer Singh and Deepika Padukone setting the screen on fire, sorry to burst your bubble! "Singham Again" decided to give the DeepVeer chemistry a rain check. Why, you ask? Rohit Shetty ne bola, "Bhailog, this film is inspired by the Ramayana!" So, Ranveer’s character, inspired by none other than Hanumanji, had no time for romance with Deepika’s Officer Shakti Shetty. Ah, the sanskari twist! 😇

In a chit-chat with India Today, Rohit Shetty revealed his mahaan plan. "It was a conscious decision, yaar! No songs, no romance—just pure action and emotion," he said. Looks like Rohit bhai was walking on eggshells, making sure not to ruffle any feathers. After all, Ramayana ke saath kaun panga lega, hai na?

While the DeepVeer fans might be a tad disappointed, Rohit had his reasons. "We didn’t want to hurt anyone emotionally," he explained. Ekdum samajhdar move, if you ask me! 😏

Arre, but don’t worry, the film is not lacking in dhamaka at all. "Singham Again" is smashing it at the box office, collecting a whopping Rs. 200 crore! Sabko pata hai, Rohit Shetty ka action always paisa vasool hota hai! 🚓💥

Kiran’s Gyan:

Doston, Bollywood is like a rollercoaster ride—kabhi romance, kabhi action, aur kabhi Ramayana ka gyaan! But remember, jab tak filmi duniya hai, tadka toh banta hai boss!😉

Tags:

  • Rohit Shetty
  • Ranveer Singh
  • Deepika Padukone
  • Singham Again
  • Bollywood Masala

    Stay tuned for more gupshup, kyunki yeh toh bas trailer tha, picture abhi baaki hai!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *